Iran is a focal state in the US policy in Middle East

To say that the role of Iran in the area is one of evasion is a misled saying. Whereas Iran is proceeding with America in the greater part of the area's issues… And Iran is a focal state in the US policy in the district, and America relies upon it in Iraq and Syria, and in Yemen, Afghanistan, and in Lebanon and others… The one following Iran's activities with nitty gritty investigation finds that apparent, as more than one of the Iranian leaders have communicated that Iran's participation with the United States is the thing that empowered it to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq… as is the case in other issues.

The majority of the political work in the locale did by Iran is in consistency and agreement with American agendas.

In Lebanon, Iran established and outfitted a party from the followers of its Madhab and, such that it turned into an uncommon armed force separate from the Lebanese armed force, and the Lebanese administration acknowledged it and their weaponry, knowing that the Lebanese system is a secular administration that follows American governmental issues. The Lebanese administration does not allow whatever other party to carry weapons nor did it acknowledge the arming of some other party.

The Party of Iran in Lebanon with the support of the Syrian administration associated with America as did Iran, and America did not prevent the Lebanese administration from allowing Iran's Hezb intervention in Syria to prop up the secular administration of Bashar al-Assad, rather there was an American implied consent to the intervention of this party in Syria without being hampered by the Lebanese armed force.

At the point when America involved Iraq it was met with a surprising resistance, so it entered Iran into Iraq to help influence those belonging to its Madhab, to influence them and prevent their movement against the occupation, even to make them remain against the resistance, notwithstanding confronting it and giving legitimacy to the occupation and to the established system.

Particularly after 2005 America allowed the ascension of a coalition of pro-Iranian parties into power, drove by Ibrahim al-Jaafari and afterward al-Maliki, and these governments were installed by America and are linked to it. Maliki's government, sponsored by Iran, consented to security and vital arrangements with the United States to maintain its influence after the official end of the occupation of Iraq, indicating American fulfillment with the role played by Iran whose officials admitted its participation with the United States in the occupation and its work to secure the steadiness of American influence in Iraq.

Iran opened its embassy in Iraq quickly after the occupation, and al-Jaafari was not chose until the Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi visited Baghdad in 2005 at the stature of the occupation. The two sides sentenced the demonstrations of imperviousness to the occupation under the pretext of condemning terrorism in Iraq. Jaafari's visit to Iran was utilized to consent to a few arrangements, including a cooperation agreement in the field of intelligence between them to establish security and control of fringe crossings and linking Basra to Iran's power network and the establishment of an oil pipeline in the middle of Basra and Abadan.

The relationship in the middle of Iran and the Syrian administration is an old one, dating back to the time of the first Intifada in the mid 80's of the past century.

Iran then supported the Syrian administration in suppressing the Muslims of Syria, in order to keep it within the American project in support of the administration drove by its agents from the Assad family.
Iran did this knowing that it is a secular nationalist Baathi system consistent with the administration of Saddam, which they were fighting in spite of the fact that it had nothing to do with Islam, rather Saddam battled Islam and its kin. Iran did this well mindful that Saddam was linked to America, it didn't shield the privileges of the Muslims, they did the polar opposite in declaring war against them and bringing triumph to a criminal Kufr administration, and Iran continues to do as such.

The Iranian administration maintains close relations with the Syrian leadership, which includes military, economic and political ties. Iran exchanged numerous weapons to support the Assad administration and furnished it with oil and gas at reduced costs because of the absence of reserves of vitality in Syria.

These political relations can particularly be seen in the Iranian interference in the Syrian revolution when the Assad administration stood on the verge of collapse. Had it not been for Iranian interference by sending troops of the Revolutionary Guards, and troops from Iran's Hezb and Maliki's militias that follow Iran, Bashar and his administration would have caved in. The massacres of Qusair, Homs and today's compound massacres in al-Ghouta and others bear witness to this intervention.